Monday, December 21, 2009

Obamas Speech wuz badddd

Karl Greenfield

I disliked the speech immensely. The President did not try to sign or put down the layout for any agreement. All of the ideas about what should the countries do to stop Global Warming was for nought. The very idea that this problem should be put off for another year is horrible. If we have waited 200 years and still not come to an agreement how long do they think the Earth can wait. Never before in Human history have we delayed so much based on the principles of energy producers and users. When our President decides to decide on the will of a few energy producers and some very questionable scientific ideals and not the safety of our globe which we do indeed share with other species which did not contribute to this catastrophe. We will be signing their death warrant as well as ours. We are following the truths that few hold self evident and are doing that not on the basis of science but on the basis of the other forces that be. Can anything be done without a trillion dollar price tag in this country. He exclaims that we will raise money for the cause but did money make the Earth? Is Ford or GM more important then the habitat they are destroying? Is an overhaul of the healthcare system that funds nothing obvious, more important then the world. It appears it is. We are not the ones who will suffer immediately. That was taken care of we will find out after the indigenous, and the poor what this can do to us. But by then it will be to late. Already they are cleaning the snow from a snowstorm, probably one of the last we will have. When it rains we adapt but when it snow we put out salt hire people to clean our sidewalks and destroy any remains of winters last gasp. Is cold really so bad?


Science hmwk speech

Assembled leaders,


Everyone here is here to stop something that should have been stopped earlier. It has been tied to corruption, wars, and mainly destruction of habitats for humans and other animals. The history of fossil fuels has been plagued with violence, deception and health affects. We used fuels that had existed on earth for tens of millions of years and are depleting there abundance in fewer then 2,000. Can we let this go, yes we can. The human race is undoubtably able to survive in harsh conditions. We will make new cooling systems and build buildings resistant to heat and water damage. But is that necessary. When the global temperature has risen nearly one and a half degrees think, how much will it rise with larger, newer factories?

Ever since the 1300’s coal smoke has blackened out the sky above Manchester. People mysteriously died with black faces and clogged lungs. The crown wanted to stop the coal industry, but an even more powerful force was in support of coal mining. Coal was one of the monopolies the church had. Religion clearly one. Child labor first acknowledged when boys were forced to crawl through 2 foot high tunnels while dragging a load of coal behind them. Cave in’s were an almost daily occurrence. When the Europeans stepped on our land they wanted to tame it and bring “good will.” After cheating the Native Americans out of land we realized there was coal in Pennsylvania. Then Pittsburgh was made by a mine owner. Unions were created to help workers in there fight for a safe workplace. So you see, coal has had a horrible past, we can change that.

Oil is much the same. The current war we are waging is a fight in countries with some of the richest oil reserves. Do you think this is a coincidence?

We must not let companies own us. I am proposing that all coal powered plants be closed by next year. You may hear them say, “but we need more time,” they have had 1300 years. How much more can we give them? Needless to say they are powerful and wealthy. But isn’t this meeting between democracies? If the people say to close them then they must! Cap and trade is by far the most popular plan here; to these companies the money they need to pay will be nothing compared to there gross incomes. Unfortunately to many in America, we do not usually see the affects of pollution. That is planned! The our industrial waste is placed in the poor areas, and despite the fact that all people are equal, they have no voice.

Do not act on your benefactors wishes but the worlds. It is almost surely to late but must we be sure that we have no chance before we act? Please consider at least upgrading to oil, and from there to solar.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Moon

  • Part of moon where the satellite crashed has a wide range of temperature.
  • Humans may be able to survive without the logistics problem of transporting water.
  • Could see water molecules because they reflected off the sun light.
  • Can be broken into hydrogen and oxygen if life needs to survive on moon.
  • The amount of water on the moon is very small and it is extremely dry, it is dryer then deserts on earth.
  • Water can also lead to the discovery of methane and other more complex elements.